Quantcast
Channel: The Football Attic
Viewing all 451 articles
Browse latest View live

Panini: Mexico 86

$
0
0
As far as my own childhood sticker-collecting activities are concerned, Panini's Mexico 86 collection was the very pinnacle of all that I did. Slightly too young to fully appreciate the 1982 World Cup when it arrived, the 1986 tournament began when I was 14 years old, my eyes wide open and my head already crammed full of football knowledge.

At the time, I lived for this most wondrous of sports, the collecting of football stickers and very little else. It was World Cup time again, and I was ready to embark on another campaign of buying, peeling, sticking and swapping.

The format for the Panini Mexico 86 album was much like those that had gone before and those that would follow. The opening page featured stickers for the official tournament emblem (the striking yet strangely familiar logo from the front cover), the tournament mascot (Pique, a moustachioed chilli pepper) and a 'World Cup Mundial' logo whose inclusion is as staggeringly unimportant now as it was back then.

Stickers showing each of the official World Cup posters appeared in perfunctory fashion on page 2 while the stadia and city locations for all the matches in Mexico were shown on pages 3, 4 and 5. After that, it was onto the players, almost always displayed in their teams across two pages, although South Korea, Iraq, Canada, Algeria and Morocco were deemed less important and had to make do with one. As ever, a team picture sticker and foil badge were present for each of the competing nations.


Having found my album in a cardboard box full of books and other memorabilia recently, I was reminded of the small details pertinent to my own Panini Mexico 86 collection. Of the 427 stickers needed to complete the album, I had fallen short by 67. Panini stated that you could only send off for a maximum of 50 back then, so I'd reluctantly called it a day knowing only too well how costly and frustrating it would be trying to find another 15 in the packets I was buying at the time.


Panini invited you to personalise their sticker albums by providing lots of spaces in which to write results and other information. This I duly did neatly and comprehensively in 1986 - much more so than I ever remember doing at any other time. My handwriting was remarkably neat too, although that'll come as little consolation to the person that inevitably ends up buying my album on eBay long after I've breathed my last.

My neatness also extended to the placement of stickers. Hardly any are out of line or askew, although I had to slap my own forehead when I recently discovered I'd stuck USSR goalkeeper Rinat Dasaev in the wrong space. How could I have made such a schoolboy error? Wait a minute - I was a schoolboy...


Despite completing nearly 85% of my album, my eyes skate guiltily over the spaces that ended up unadorned. So many important players I didn't manage to find, like a Who's Who of world soccer: Paolo Rossi, Jorge Burruchaga, Vincenzo Scifo, Norman Whiteside, Kenny Dalglish, Paulo Futre... each one an aching chasm of potential left unfulfilled.

Yes, folks, that's what happens when you don't send off that cheque or postal order and complete your Panini collection. I'm sure I'd have felt pleased with my efforts in filling in so much of my album 28 years ago, but it's those gaps that leave you with a lingering deep regret, believe me.


No matter. The stickers I did get were great, even if their overall design (like the album itself) lacked any great excitement. And I completed a few of the teams, too - Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada... just those three, but a finer trio you'd be hard pushed to find.


Somehow greater than the sum of its parts, Panini's Mexico 86 was a classic collection enjoyed by so many kids when it was released. It also turned out to be my last Panini World Cup album from those far off juvenile days. The following year I'd leave school, get a job and put away my childish things.

Yet holding this album now, aged 42-and-three-quarters, I sense only too well how worn and slightly grubby it is. A little frayed at the edges and with things scribbled here and there on its pages, I clearly loved this album a lot back then, and it's not difficult to see how much effort I put into keeping it in good condition for posterity. I'm glad I did. It's one of my favourite possessions and a great souvenir of a fine tournament.


Football Attic Podcast 18 - Get involved!

$
0
0
Attention audio aficionados!

We're pleased to announce that we'll be recording our 18th Football Attic Podcast over the weekend of 24/25 May 2014, and as ever, we'd like you to be a part of it!

Once again, we'll be focusing on the World Cup, but this time we'll be picking our favourite three memories from each of the tournaments we've seen. And you can join us on our trip down memory lane!

We'd like you to pick one tournament and choose your favourite three memories from it. Once you've done that, simply send them to us using one of the following three methods:

By website:
Use the 'comments' link below and type in your text

By Twitter:
Cram your memories into 140 characters or less at Twitter.com/footballattic

By Facebook:
Share your favourite moments with us over at Facebook.com/TheFootballAttic

We'll do our very best to read out as many of your comments as possible, and we look forward to hearing from you. Thanks for taking part!

FIFA World Cup - In captions (Part 3)

$
0
0
The concluding part of our series looking at the style and design of TV captions during the World Cup.

World Cup 1998

The French have a saying: 'plus ça change'. Roughly translated, it means 'the more things change, the more they stay the same.' This was a fair description of the captions seen during the 1998 World Cup, albeit with a little bit of animation thrown in for good measure.


Where USA '94 had been all about the blue rectangular panels that displayed informative text of all kinds, France '98 tweaked things slightly by using a blue ribbon motif and bulky lettering. Any names that were displayed showed only the surnames most of the time, but the captions appeared in the wake of a football that swept from left to right, leaving behind the text, a pinched-in-the-middle ribbon and a fluttering flag.


A similar look was applied to the captions for the scoreline and yellow/red cards. For the former, a timer was included in the top-right corner which displayed a small '1' or '2' to indicate which half of the match you were watching. A tilted yellow or red card floated onto the ribbon from foreground whenever one had been awarded by the referee.


As has been seen during previous tournaments, a degree of inconsistency was evident from time to time in the standardisation of the captions. During World Cup '98, substitutions were detailed in one of two ways. Some used upward and downward pointing triangles to show who was leaving and entering the field of play, while others showed a downward pointing arrow next to the name prior to the whole ribbon flipping on its horizontal axis. The reverse side showed the player being introduced, along with an upward pointing arrow. All very confusing in a pointy sort of way.


Every once in a while, the captions for this tournament broke the mould and indulged in a greater use of colour than was normal. Take the team listings, for example. Here, a series of three curved panels created a frame of sorts for the image lying beneath. On top of the panels were the the team name, the coach's name and the players in the starting line-up, all with a blue tab (or green, if you were the goalkeeper) showing the shirt number.


An almost identical caption was used to show the squad members that could potentially make an appearance as a substitute. In this case, any players that were unavailable to play had their names shown in dark grey.

An even more colourful set of captions were saved for the referee and his officials. In past tournaments, it was enough to simply show the surnames and nationalities of the people involved. At France '98, a curved panel at the bottom of the screen showed all of that on a patterned background in the colour of the officials' shirts, be they black, yellow or red/pink. A nice creative touch, and one that seemed sadly absent from many of the other captions.


The only other splash of colour was found whenever a penalty shoot-out came to pass. A strangely contrived panel was displayed to keep viewers up to date on who had scored and who hadn't, and on this occasion it was done with the help of green squares showing a football and a red square showing an empty goal net. All very graphical but a bit too overdone when you compare it to the simplicity of the 1994 'Othello' approach.


As for new innovation, that could be summed up in one word - 'Opposée'. That was the word accompanying a peculiar square-encased image of what looked like a CCTV camera that denoted a 'reverse angle' view of a previously seen piece of action. Possibly the most redundant of all football captions, given that most people can work out why the direction of play has switched, and the graphic hardly gave it any credibility either.


If this was the best that the 1990's could offer, it was probably time for a new attitude and a new millennium...

World Cup 2002

Finally everything fell into place. Having embraced the potential for computers to jazz up the presentation of football on television back in the 1980's, we were now finally getting what was hoped for. The 2002 World Cup brought us some genuinely original design, dynamism, animation and a completely new look for a new era.


To be specific, this was the era of the lozenge. Gone were the boring panels and ribbons of the previous couple of tournaments. Now we had three-dimensional pale blue pointed shapes that showed the name of the team, the name of a player or the name of a coach. Many times they had a circular flag to the left with a beam of light rotating around it, and often there was an accompanying shadow-tinted panel to display additional information.


It all looked a bit like a FIFA video game, but perhaps that was no bad thing as a modernisation of TV's World Cup captions was long overdue. Chief among the most obvious visual changes was the font - a strange character set that used 'small caps' rather than 'all caps' or lower case to get the message across. Quirky it may have been, but it was certainly clear and readable.


In general, it's fair to say that this was the World Cup where the caption designers were given free rein to do whatever they liked, however they liked. Even the smallest of changes were worthy of mention, and there were many of them. On the team lists, for example, the goalkeepers had a small glove symbol displayed next to their names, and any players that had previously been awarded a yellow card were indicated accordingly too.


If you were lucky enough to catch an early sight of the local feed in Japan or South Korea prior to the match starting, you'd have seen a myriad of different captions telling you about the climatic conditions at the stadium. This level of information had been dropped for France '98 having been seen occasionally in the two World Cups prior to that, but here it was, back again, with icons galore for wind speed, weather, temperature and humidity.


There was even room for a degree of creativity whenever a substitution was made. Here, a caption showed the name of the player leaving the field alongside a stylised red arrow on a 'lozenge', his replacement's name displayed below on a shadow panel. As the new player entered the field of play, the lozenge swivelled round on its horizontal axis to show the two names had switched places and a green arrow indicating the oncoming substitute.


This pleasant use of animation wasn't too overused throughout the competition, and in the main it stayed just about on the right side of gimmickry, in my view. Curiously, there were far fewer instances of a player's name being shown during idle moments of gameplay, unless the player in question was injured or receiving a card of one sort or another.

World Cup 2002 saw the return of the 'reverse angle' caption in the form of a Viagra tab in the bottom-left corner of the screen, but a new 'Additional Time' version of the same showed an electronic board standing proud with the number of extra minutes illuminated on it. Clever stuff.


As ever, the most eagerly awaited use of graphics in the full set of captions was saved for the penalty shoot-outs, and here we saw a simplified, more intuitive version of what went before in 1998. Instead of balls, goal nets and squares, this time we saw the return of the 1994 spots, this time coloured in red and green to show goals scored and not scored. No ambiguity, no complications - just a nice visual that typified this whole collection from 2002.


World Cup 2006

Inevitably, things got very corporate by the time World Cup 2006 came around. The styling and branding of the official FIFA website transferred itself seamlessly to the TV captions, but that wasn't necessarily a bad thing in retrospect. Any lack of free thinking was certainly made up for in clean-looking text and even more polished graphics.


Where Japan/Korea 2002 had lozenges, Germany 2006 had breadsticks - grey ones that showed the key information above a returning set of shadow panels for extra data. The breadsticks (believe me, I'm trying to think of a better way to describe them, but am failing) almost always had a curved flag to the left that seemed to swoop over the top from an indiscriminate point behind. The flags looked nice, although their 'swooping' nature suggested someone in the design department was trying a bit too hard to break free of the rectangular/circular flags seen before.


Broadcasting standards had improved to such an extent that HD TV was now becoming more widely available, and that meant greater clarity when reading the text and more picture space for those with widescreen televisions. All of that would come in handy for reading the extra information that was being displayed on screen, indicating how many goals a player had scored in the tournament or how much possession the teams had had so far - even the miniature digital boards shown next to the names of the fourth and fifth officials.


Slight variations on previously used themes could be seen throughout the tournament in Germany. Substitutions, for instance, improved on the 'rotating lozenge' method used in 2002 by having the two names rotating as if on rollers when the two players exchanged places. Again, both names swapped over - one roller, or 'breadstick', if you will, giving greater emphasis to the player leaving or entering the field of play.


Furthermore, the awarding of a second yellow card to a player resulted in a small animation showing a second yellow rectangle appearing next to the first before merging into a single red one. Once again, only a small thing, but beautifully executed.

The final example of a slight enhancement of the previously acceptable captions of 2002 was seen during the four penalty shoot-outs of World Cup 2006. Again, the red and green dots were retained (looking more like lights this time) but now they were shown below the team names rather than alongside them.

Whether they look better that way is a matter for personal opinion, but either way, they, and all the other captions, again looked very slick and very easy on the eye, as one would hope and expect them to be.


World Cup 2010

And so to the most recent collection of World Cup captions in which all the graphics from 2006 were given an orange coat of paint and everything else remained virtually the same as it was.


Well not quite, but nearly. The breadsticks were back, albeit with their ends cut on the diagonal and tinted pale orange; the font was almost the same, but the flags no long swooped. Instead, they were stuck near the end of the breadsticks in an artistic, slanty fashion.


Gone too were the shadow panels that were used for supplemental information. They were now replaced with a metallic orange equivalent that had an ornate and curly design incorporated into them. Such a fancy way of doing things had now become the norm in other tournaments, most notably Euro 2004 and 2012.


That bright orange background was most visible during the traditional 'team line-up' sequence which now, finally, allowed the viewer to see the players in their correct formation - something that hadn't been seen since the captions of the 1966 World Cup. And there was also a welcome return to the fluttering flag - now displayed on a bigger scale than ever before.


Aside from the visual appeal of the many and varied 2010 captions, there was also the manner in which they appeared on the screen - namely 'from out of a golden beam of light'. It was this yellowy glow that occasionally spread across the lower part of the screen before turning into a gold bar capped with brushed metal tips and then transformed again into the fully formed scoreline or whatever the caption happened to be.


There wasn't a whole lot of other animation on show during the tournament. Granted, the awarding of a second yellow card brought forth a sequence where the yellow card next to a player's name divided into two, whirled around and changed into a red card, but that was all silly nonsense, really.


Essentially, World Cup 2010 brought us a more refined version of the sort of thing we saw in 2006. Sometimes there were statistics for 'shots on goal' and 'possession' - inevitably becoming more important even than the players' names, a lot of the time. The breadsticks still revolved when the players changed places. And the penalty shoot-outs? Well now it was green and red ticks and crosses instead of spots.


Oh don't get me wrong - the captions all looked fine in their own way, but now it was more apparent than ever before that we'd reached the end of the line where expansive, original design was concerned. From here onwards, it'll be corporate branding all the way, keeping 'on message' with the rest of FIFA's marketing department. No more funny fonts, no more colourful flag plinths or video windows showing the players in the team. If it hasn't been designed to within an inch of its life, it isn't going to be seen during any future World Cup.


And that's kind of sad, in a way. No matter how basic the technology available at different times in the past, the caption makers have always found a way to innovate and break new ground from time to time. Now it seems, their work is done.

If you like well designed graphics, you'll no doubt still get them when the 2014 World Cup begins next month and every four years thereafter, but will they make you smile? It's difficult to say so, but I very much doubt they will.

See also:

FIFA World Cup - In captions (Part 1)
FIFA World Cup - In captions (Part 2)

The Football Attic Podcast 18 - World Cup Top 3s

$
0
0
The 2014 World Cup is less than a month away, so what better way to mark that occasion than by talking for an hour and a half about previous World Cups? We've done that before? What? Naaaaah! This is different cos like we are doin top 3s innit. Sick blud!

So sit back and hear all about the spectacular Soviet goal machine, Bulgarian tantrums and Scottish capitulations!

And just what is Rich's problem with 2002?

Download:
Subscribe on iTunes or download here. Alternatively, catch The Football Attic Podcast on Square One Football Radio.

See also:
The Football Attic Podcast archive

Commercial Break: Match Weekly 'Quiz Disc' (1981)

$
0
0
Back at the start of January 2014, we recorded Football Attic Podcast 15 on the subject of Shoot! and Match magazine, and as has become traditional, we put out an appeal ahead of the recording to ask for your memories of either.

While many people regaled us with their remembrances of Shoot's League Ladders, two of you tugged our coats to tell us about a long-forgotten give-away gift in Match Weekly magazine.

Andrew Rockall said at the time: "Match gave away a flexidisc record with a quiz on it. Hoddle, Peter Withe and stretching my memory I think… Alan Kennedy were the contestants. Hosted by Mike Ingham, it was a three-parter and the discs were coloured 7-inch."

Mark Taylor meanwhile, said: "I remember the flexidiscs on the cover featuring interviews with the likes of Hoddle and Keegan. I still have them somewhere. The needle tended to skip off them fairly quickly."

Yet you know how it is: even though two people corroborate the existence of such a thing, you can't quite allow yourself to believe it until you've seen it for yourself.

Well now we can! Unearthed from the millions of hours of footage uploaded to YouTube, we found this - an actual TV advert for Match Weekly magazine!

Beat that, Shoot...

Up For The World Cup (1986)

$
0
0
Under what circumstances can a large piece of printed paper be given such reverence and adoration? When it is printed with the fixtures for the first World Cup to ever ignite your growing love of international football.

The 1986 World Cup was going to be majestic in all its colour and magnificence. I'd seen bits of the 1982 tournament, but it had all arrived slightly too early for me, as if I'd become a fan of The Beatles in the year they split up. Fragmented imagery and an awareness of past glories was fine, but I wanted to see what a new World Cup would really be like. My eyes were wide open and I simply couldn't wait.

In order to get myself in the right frame of mind for Mexico '86, I bought and read whatever items I could find as part of a relentless campaign to educate myself on this sensational sporting spectacle. World Soccer magazine (a publication I'd discovered in 1985) helped, to say nothing of Shoot! and Match Weekly, and that was without the growing mountain of memorabilia being created in readiness for the event.

There was, however, one item that trumped the lot; a single thing that crossed the line between useless tat and treasure for the ages. It was a 'wallchart magazine' and it was called Up For The World Cup.


I knew about the humble domestic origins of this wallchart ('magazine' was stretching things a little far, to be fair). Up For the FA Cup had been a previous purchase of mine and similarly worked its way into my affections with its ability to brighten up a dowdy bedroom wall and my boring mid-teen existence. That version, like this new World Cup equivalent, had a Unique Selling Point that captured the imagination of school-age kids like myself - stickers.


On the FA Cup editions, those stickers were small thumbnail graphics of English club badges, backed with adhesive and ready to be applied to the wallchart. For the 1986 World Cup version, the stickers were flags - 96 in all, 30 millimetres tall and 35 millimetres wide, each one named in clear, bold text. It was one thing to be so excited about filling in all the gaps on your wallchart, but just imagine the potential for decorating school exercise books and pieces of household furniture with them.


I'm happy to say my wallchart did find a home on my bedroom wall - not folded in a cupboard for me. It was proudly displayed above the bed in which I slept, results written in neatly, flags applied with care and attention for those all-important knockout matches. In fact such was the high esteem I held that wallchart in that I designed, painted, cut and mounted a cardboard version of the Mexico 86 tournament logo to go above it. The entire display was a manifestation of my love for the World Cup that probably peaked that year, and I wasn't embarrassed to show it.

Bedroom display: artist's reconstruction
Before it went on my wall, I'd studiously read every word of its 'magazine' part on the reverse, and observed the beautiful colour pictures of all 24 competing nations. Teams I'd never seen before in kits I was unfamiliar with; Iraq and Algeria in green, Morocco and South Korea in bright red, the gold of Brazil and the blue of Italy. Even the tracksuits had an exciting design element.


There was information on the venues to digest, details about the tournament format and history, plus interviews with key figures from the world game. Northern Ireland's Sammy McIllroy and Scotland's Graeme Souness assessed their group opponents while admitting to knowing very little about them. Morten Olsen, captain of Denmark, discussed his team's preparations for the tournament while former Blackpool goalkeeper Tony Waiters (head coach of the Canada's World Cup squad) spoke of the importance of the NASL in developing the skills of many a Canadian football player.


But that was all a far cry from the star attraction: the front of the wallchart with all its flags, empty boxes in which to write the scores and colour photos of the world's top players. The version you see here is one I bought some time ago from eBay. On it, the previous owner has commendably filled in lots of details right up to the quarter finals and stopped before the tournament reached its end. On my original, I filled it in completely; no details missed, nothing overlooked.


You'll have to take my word for that as my original wallchart has long since slipped quietly from my possession, but I did, because this was my everything back in the summer of 1986. And owning another one now, despite it being someone else's? Well that makes no difference to me. This is something truly special, and it makes me happy to have it in my possession again.

Fantasy Nostalgia: How to get Scotland into World Cup Round 2...

$
0
0
Football is full of traditions. Whether it's the need to go for a pre-match pint of beer or the irresistible desire to support the little team in a 'David v Goliath' cup tie, there are some things we can't help ourselves doing where football's concerned.

Another tradition, especially if you're English, is to remind those kindly Scottish folk that their national team are as likely to reach the Second Round of the World Cup as it is of winning the Nobel Prize for Literature. It's an old joke and getting more and more worn out with every passing year.

Yet a friend of The Football Attic, Andrew Rockall, seems to have come up with a valid reason why Scotland failed to progress beyond the group stage of at least one World Cup Finals. Andrew writes:

'Have you ever wondered how the 1982 World Cup would have played out if they'd used a different format - say the one used in 1986?'

If we're honest, we hadn't. Some of you will remember that the 1982 tournament employed a system whereby the winners and runners-up of the six First Round groups qualified for the Second Round, who in turn were distributed among four groups of three. After that, the winners of the Second Round groups went through to the Semi Finals and so on, thus:


For the 1986 World Cup, the format was tweaked... or 'made more complicated' as people usually remember it. In the First Round, the top two from each of the six groups progressed along with the four best teams that finished third in their groups. After that, a plain and simple knockout format was brought in, but it's that First Round change that prompted Andrew to wonder how things might have been if the 1986 format was applied to the 1982 competition:

"I have followed the logic of the draw from 1986 to get the four best 3rd-placed qualifiers from each of the original groups. I ranked them 1 to 4 by points and goal difference..."

The result is a knockout stage for the 1982 World Cup that looks very different from the one shown above:


Andrew speculates which teams would have won each of the matches from the Second Round onwards and estimates "a France-Italy final, with France winning. They'd played each other in February that year, with the French winning 2-0."

But wait a minute - what's that curious blue flag with a white 'X' on it?  Yes folks, that's Scotland, and according to Andrew's calculations they'd have progressed from their First Round group in 1982 if the 1986 system had been in use. A meeting with West Germany may well have snuffed out any hopes they'd have had of winning the trophy, but even so... this could have been history being made right before our very eyes.

And so we thank Andrew Rockall for this precious glimpse at what might have been. Next week: The Football Attic looks at the effect of goal-line technology on England's victory over West Germany in the 1966 World Cup Final...

Panini's World Cup 'Nearly Men'

$
0
0
Question: What connects the following football players? Andy Gray, Carlos Alberto, Ruud Gullit, Kenny Dalglish, Eder, Phil Neville and Robert Pires.

Need a few more clues? How about Steven Gerrard, Roberto Bettega, Dan Petrescu, Fabrizio Ravanelli and David Beckham?

The answer? They've all appeared in a Panini World Cup sticker album but failed to appear in the World Cup tournament it was commemorating.

It happens more often than you think and for good reason. As if to officially begin the countdown to a World Cup tournament, Panini launch their official sticker collections several weeks in advance. It gives you ample opportunity to familiarise yourself with all the names and faces waiting to create a patchwork of footballing wonderment in front of your very eyes in the days to come.

This is a decent gesture on the part of Panini, however it comes at a cost. By launching their World Cup sticker albums so early, Panini can't tell for certain which players will feature in the official 23-man squads when they're announced. Not only that, but they're hardly in a position to tell which players will get injured just prior to the tournament, either.

All they can do is take an educated guess as to which players will get the nod when the World Cup arrives. It's a thankless task because on virtually every page of their World Cup sticker albums you'll find someone that never actually figured in the World Cup for that year.

Take Panini's 2014 World Cup album, for instance. Inside you'll see Robinho of Brazil, Arbeloa of Spain, Van der Vaart of the Netherlands, Ribery of France and Ashley Cole of England... yet none of them are playing their part in this year's competition.

So how long has this been happening, and just how inaccurate are Panini's World Cup albums? To find out, I leafed through the pages of every edition from Mexico 70 to World Cup 2014, checking and cross-referencing each of the 4,895 individual player stickers with the 304 official squad lists from each of the 12 competitions.

Overall accuracy

The details that emerged make interesting reading. Overall, 14% of all the players that feature on Panini World Cup stickers don't actually appear in their national squad for the relevant tournament. To put it another way, if every two-page team spread currently displays 17 player stickers, 2.4 of them would be included erroneously.

Whether that figure seems quite high is a matter for personal judgement, but it is fair to say that this is just a straight average. Some albums have had an admirable record for accuracy while others have been less successful. Here's a graph showing the number of players correctly/incorrectly included in each one:

Click for larger version

Back in the  Mexico 70 album, there were only 192 player stickers - only 35% of the amount you'd find in the 2014 equivalent - but Panini got 90.9% of those players right. Over the next two albums, that figure slipped to around 83% before the accuracy level rose again steadily to the all-time high of 91.8% for the Italia '90 album.

Again, the number of wrongly featured players the World Cup increased sharply and the France 98 album contained the highest number of 'nearly men' of all, accounting for 18% of all those in the album - nearly one in five. Since then, the accuracy levels have bounced back slowly, tournament on tournament, which perhaps you'd expect in an age where up-to-date information is available everywhere.

Team accuracy

So just how difficult is it for Panini to get an entire team completely correct? More difficult than you think. In that first album for Mexico 70, four of the sixteen teams were entirely made up of players that did make it into the final squads for the tournament. This 25% success rate was as good as it ever got. For USA '94 and World Cup 2006, none of the 24 and 32 teams respectively were without wrongly featured players.

Click for larger version
You might also be wondering which teams have contained the most errors throughout the 44 years of Panini's World Cup sticker collections. For that, you have to look at the Cameroon team as shown in the France 98 album. Sixteen players were available to collect, but nine of them never actually made the trip to the 16th World Cup. Many other teams have been similarly replete with wrongly-included players down the years, including Australia's six-man contingent in the Mexico 70 album, two of whom didn't warrant an inclusion.

Cameroon in Panini's France 98 album: Bad at crosses
In a cumulative sense, Cameroon haven't fared too well in Panini World Cup history. They've had 115 players appearing in seven albums, but 23 of them didn't feature in the relevant tournament - an accuracy rate of 80%. Still, that's not as bad as Togo whose only appearance in 2006 saw five of their 17 players featured under false pretences - an accuracy rate of only 71%.

Click for larger version
At the other end of the scale, five teams have made a single and entirely correct appearance in a Panini World Cup album, namely Haiti (1974), Jamaica (1998), Kuwait (1982), North Korea (2010) and Zaire (1974). Of those that have appeared in more than one album, Slovenia lead the way with 31 correctly included players out of 32 across the 2002 and 2010 tournaments.

Click for larger version
Player accuracy

Finally, let us consider the humble player. Exactly how would you feel if you'd appeared in one of Panini's highly acclaimed World Cup sticker albums but never actually been part of the squad that played in the tournament? 'Mixed emotions' is a phrase that springs to mind.

Imagine that moment when, in your senior years, your grandchild finds an old Panini album in the loft and says "Wow Grandpa - you actually played in the World Cup!" Could you look him or her in the eye and admit your dirty secret?

Well let's take that one step further. Imagine you'd appeared in TWO Panini World Cup sticker albums but never played in either competition. Serious embarrassment, and yet there is a select band of 21 international players who share that pain. Their names, writ large for all eternity to observe, are as follows:

  • Rhys Williams (Australia, 2010 and 2014)
  • Mauro Silva (Brazil, 1998 and 2002)
  • Bernard Tchoutang (Cameroon, 1998 and 2002)
  • Sebastian Deisler (Germany, 2002 and 2006)
  • Pavel Pardo (Mexico, 2002 and 2010)
  • Dumisane Ngobe (South Africa, 1998 and 2002)
  • Talal Al-Meshal (Saudi Arabia, 2002 and 2006)
  • Al Temawi (Saudi Arabia 1994 and 1998)
  • Johan Vonlanthen (Switzerland, 2006 and 2010)
  • Chris Henderson (USA, 1994 and 1998)
  • Fedor Cherenkov (Soviet Union, 1986 and 1990)
  • Christoffer Andersson (Sweden, 2002 and 2006)
  • Aldo De Nigris (Mexico, 2010 and 2014)
  • Lee Dong-Gook (South Korea, 2002 and 2006)
  • Julio Cesar Enciso (Paraguay, 2002 and 2006)
  • Josep Guardiola (Spain, 1998 and 2002)
  • Mustapha Khali (Morocco, 1994 and 1998)
  • Dimitar Popov (Bulgaria, 1994 and 1998)
  • Eric Tinkler (South Africa, 1998 and 2002)
  • John Jairo Trellez (Colombia, 1990 and 1994)
  • Javier Zanetti (Argentina, 2006 and 2010)
It can even cross generations. When Klaus Sammer appeared in the Munich 74 album for East Germany (but not in the 1974 World Cup itself), little did he know his son, Matthias, would suffer the same fate when representing Germany in the 1998 album.

It's a tricky business trying to produce a factually correct sticker album, but Panini have managed to get it mostly right most of the time. Of the 4,895 players that have appeared in their World Cup collections, 686 didn't make the short trip from album to tournament - a potent reminder that football, like life, doesn't always transpire as you think. Not that it will come as any consolation to anyone possessing several doubles of the 1998 Cameroon team.

World Cup super groups

$
0
0
In case you hadn't noticed, we're coming to the end of that beautiful bubble known as 'the First Round of the World Cup'. It's beautiful because the 32 greatest footballing nations in the world are thrown together into eight groups of four in a curious, sometimes bizarre mix of geography, playing ability and experience.

It all starts with the draw, usually made six months or more before the tournament begins. Upon completion, it's as much as we can do to ponder on the deliciously random permutations that have been set before us. Will 'Team A' beat 'Team B'? Will 'Team C' top the group? Will 'Team D' cause an upset or two?

Before a ball has been kicked, we take it upon ourselves to figure out whether any given group is a good one, a great one, or even a 'Group of Death.' It is a time when we can dream about the things we will see and the battles that will ensue - and all, initially at least, within the confines of each of those fabulous First Round groups.

So what is it that gives a group so much potential for excitement? Regardless of how it might eventually pan out, what makes a First Round group look good on paper? Having given the matter some thought, I arrived at the three main criteria that would lead me to the greatest groups in World Cup history - in principle, at least.

Continental variety

There's no getting away from it: if a group contains four teams and they each represent a different continent, you're in for a feast of contrasting playing styles that will sustain you no matter who's playing who.

The trouble is, you can't always guarantee that four different continents will be represented. Granted it's more likely to happen these days than it used to, but up until 1994 you were still very likely to see three European teams and one other bunched together in the same group.

Go back further still, and you start running into groups of three - even a group of two in the form of the Uruguay-Bolivia pairing of 1950. Not much continental variety in that one, it's fair to say.

Minnow shock potential

It's only natural to consider the smallest team in any group for they often dictate the fate of the others. A minor footballing nation can either shock one of the big teams or be thrashed to such a disturbingly bad extent that they affect the balance of goal difference.

Fortunately it's the shock potential that everyone wants to see realised, so it's essential that if a group's going to have a minnow, it needs to be a good one. That said, there have been one or two groups down the years that have not really had a minnow at all - just a couple of average teams that should be doing better. For the purpose of this exercise, teams of that nature only serve to lessen the quality of a group.

Overall team quality

It goes without saying, of course, that a group of four stunningly great countries will always be somewhere near the top of a 'best groups' list. Unfortunately it's highly improbable to realise such a thing, especially with the current seeding system.

Still, if you've got the best teams in each seeding group, you should have plenty of fun on your hands when the action gets underway, so the better the talent, the better the group... hopefully.

The super groups

Using the three criteria shown above, I've judged each of the First Round groups from World Cup history and awarded a score between 0 and 10 for each category. Using that as my flawed, unscientific system for assessment, I have arrived at what I think are the three groups that are best overall - at least before a ball was kicked...

World Cup 2006: Group F
Brazil - Australia - Croatia - Japan

Four different continents represented? Tick. Presence of reigning world champions and Asian champions? Tick. So far, so good. Lowering the 'overall team quality' score, however, were Croatia who had reached the group stage of Euro 2004 but were found wanting at the time, and Australia, ranked 42nd in the world going into the tournament and playing in their first World Cup for 32 years.

For that very reason, however, Australia could be classed as minnows of sorts, and may conceivably have possessed the sort of plucky spirit needed to upset the Japans or Croatias of this world. As it turned out, that's exactly what they did have, beating the former 3-1 and earning a respectable 2-2 draw with the latter.

Unfortunately, this group could only throw up 2.6 goals per game, and nearly half of those were scored by Brazil. If Croatia had shown some improvement on Euro 2004 or Japan lived up to their FIFA ranking, who knows - maybe this could have been one of the all time classic groups.

Continental variety: 10  Minnow shock potential: 5.5  Overall team quality: 6  TOTAL: 21.5

World Cup 2014: Group A
Brazil - Mexico - Croatia - Cameroon

Yes, a First Round group from the current tournament, and ironically one that again features Brazil and Croatia. It also has four continents represented and two countries in Mexico and Cameroon that bring plenty of potential for colourful football.

All that put to one side, this group didn't really have a minnow to speak of. Granted, Cameroon were ranked 56th by FIFA going into this World Cup, but the Indomitable Lions have been in seven of the last nine tournaments. Hardly a North Korea or a Haiti and more than capable of tripping up any of the other three teams.

As for overall quality of the competing nations, this group contains four that have been well short of their best in recent contests. There's Brazil, ranked third best by FIFA, a team that could only reach the quarter finals of the 2011 Copa America, while Mexico lost all three of their First Round games in the same tournament. Then there's Croatia, who failed to qualify for the Euro 2012 finals, and Cameroon, who did likewise for the 2013 African Cup of Nations. Hardly the sort of form to set the tournament alight.

For all that, however, they have given us three goals per game over the last fortnight, and, in the shape of Brazil and Mexico, two teams that may very well make it to the last eight of the competition. In general, a good variation of styles, experience and skill.

Continental variety: 10  Minnow shock potential: 5.5  Overall team quality: 6  TOTAL: 21.5

World Cup 2014: Group C
Colombia - Ivory Coast - Japan - Greece

I know what you're thinking. Hardly a classic in the end, what with Japan and Ivory Coast lacking the quality they once had and Greece going through with a -2 goal difference, but on paper we had four different continents represented, plus Colombia (ranked 8th in the world by FIFA before the tournament started) and Greece (ranked 12th). Ivory Coast were rated as the second best African side and Japan are no pushovers either.

What went slightly against this group, as with the last one, was the lack of a genuine minnow. If you consider Japan to be the rank outsiders in this selection (a team appearing in its fifth consecutive World Cup and reigning Asian champions), it's not easy to consider their beating any of the other three as much of a shock. The fact that they didn't beat anyone only makes it all the more sad, actually.

That aside, however, the overall quality of all four teams was good, so all in all, this was a decent group - if not a classic in reality. A decent South American side playing close to home, an African side that peaked a little too early and a Greek side that only just remembered how to regain their form of Euro 2004. Oh, and Japan - admittedly disappointing.

Continental variety: 10  Minnow shock potential: 5.5  Overall team quality: 6.5  TOTAL: 22

So there you have it - a thorough, if inconclusive look at the best First Round groups based on their potential to excite and entertain before they began. You wouldn't really call any of them 'memorable', but then our memory of classic opening groups of the past perhaps never really existed. Either they were too imbalanced by a glut of European teams or the minnows were too weak, or maybe the teams in general just weren't up to the required standard. Maybe the next World Cup will give us the First Round Super Group we'd all be dreaming of...

Do you remember any World Cup First Round groups that could potentially outshine the three shown above? If so, tell us all about them. Leave us a comment below and share your memories with us!

Retro Random Video: ITV World Cup 78 (again)

$
0
0
Way back at the start of the year, we brought you a wonderful video clip (courtesy of our good friend Geoff Downs) that showed just what ITV's coverage of the 1978 World Cup was like. In short, it had Brian Moore and a two dubious hair styles worn no doubt for a bet by Andy Gray and Kevin Keegan.

Needless to say that must have whet your appetite for the rarely seen delights of ITV Sport's logo-shaped studio and everything else besides, so here's another clip for you. This time, we go back to the start of the tournament and a chance to see part of the opening ceremony, again presided over by Brian Moore and Kevin Keegan.

As before, we humbly provide you with our handy go-to guide on what to look out for and when, as we thank Geoff Downs once again for allowing us to peruse this televisual gem.



0:00
Once again, the blue caption board makes an appearance. None of your over-familiar 'ITV Sport' here, you know - oh no... 'Independent Television Sport', if you don't mind...

0:11
The opening titles are well underway and to get us in the mood, here's some imagery taken from... the 1974 Opening Ceremony. Oh well, if that's all that was available... There are huge half-footballs on the pitch, each one opening up to show a random collection of young people that have been paid a nominal fee to look excited. And a succession of captions telling us which teams have reached the 1978 Finals. And an 'F' in the bottom-right corner for no apparent reason.

0:35
There's a bit of time to spare before "the satellite pictures are due up to Europe" so Brian Moore introduces Kevin Keegan as a studio guest. Bet you can't wait to get out there on the pitch and start playing, eh Kev? Oh no, you can't, can you? WE FAILED TO QUALIFY, DIDN'T WE...?

0:58
OK, so you've been recharging your batteries instead, eh Kev? What's that? You've had a rest since the end of the league season? Great... What have you been up to, then? You visited your wife... Oh right... Go anywhere nice? The Costa Brava, perhaps? Somewhere sunny and hot near the Meditteranean? Ah... right. Not the answer I was expecting...

1:37
Ooh look - more footage from 1974, and this time a chance to see Poland play West Germany on the Wettest World Cup Pitch Ever ™. Gerry Harrison is your commentator.

4:15
Ah, good - the pictures have arrived, so it's over to the River Plate stadium to see how good Gerald Sinstadt is at describing a meticulous formation display featuring 1,700 Argentinian children.

"This is Argentina 78" he says, and by jove, he's right if the performance on the pitch is anything to go by.

5:20
"Flight of pigeons" remarks Sinstadt, seemingly unaware that we're looking at hundreds of doves taking to the wing. Or maybe they are pigeons? Pure bred doves must be hard to come by? Expensive, even. It'd make sense to go for the economical option, especially if... sorry - move on...

06:15
Oops. Accidental inclusion of some obscure advertising, there, thanks to our friends at Argentinian TV filming the whole occasion for us. Nice scoreboard though...

Er, out of interest, what is an Autotrol?

07:36
The parade of the competing nations begins as the Argentinian flag is walked in, held firm by 22 tracksuited assistants. Unfortunately their progress is impeded somewhat by a considerably large gaggle of photographers... idiots.

08:31
According to Brer Sinstadt, "that football symbolises the World Cup"... Except it isn't a football really, is it? It's more like a stylised globe, if you want our opinion. "It's inside a horse-shoe shape which is probably seen as the Argentine 78 symbol", we're told. Well it might be if they ever get round to finishing it off...

08:58
And in come the flags of every country comprising the happy family of FIFA. A glorious technicolor parade and one that's totally wasted on the Argentine audience as apparently they're watching all this in black and white. Seems hardly worth it, really...

The Football Attic Podcast 19 - World Cup Films

$
0
0
What better way to celebrate the spectacle that is a World Cup Finals than by distilling all the excitement and drama of four weeks of football into a 90 minute film... with all that excitement and drama removed?  Yes folks, welcome to the world of the Official FIFA Films of the World Cup!

Chris and Rich dissect all the existing films in what some might call a reductive manner... we'd say it's a fitting tribute... ;-)

Warning - contains gross stereotypes and regional accents!


Download:
Subscribe on iTunes or download here. Alternatively, catch The Football Attic Podcast on Square One Football Radio.

See also:
The Football Attic Podcast archive

The Football Attic Podcast World Cup Extra No.1

$
0
0
There's a World Cup on don't ya know! To that end, Rich teamed up with Jay from DesignFootball.com to discuss the competition so far.

The original plan was to record one a week, but as you may well know with Attic podcasts, that sort of regularity just ain't gonna happen!

As it goes, this one was recorded just before the last lot of group games started, so it's kinda way out of date, but hey... we'll put it out there anyway... Unjoy!


Download:
Subscribe on iTunes or download here. Alternatively, catch The Football Attic Podcast on Square One Football Radio.

See also:
The Football Attic Podcast archive

Review: 'Admiral: Kit Man' by Bert Patrick

$
0
0
These days it seems perfectly acceptable to discuss football kit design without having any knowledge of its bounteous history. The trouble is, few people can speak with any authority about the production of football kits in Britain, which is why the release of Bert Patrick's new book has caused such a ripple of excitement.

'Admiral: Kit man' is a rare chance to find out how one of the great football brands rose to prominence in the 1970's and disappeared almost completely thereafter, as described by its figurehead and managing director. What you'll gain from reading the title depends largely on your prior knowledge of football kit design, but even a self-imposed expert will find something of note to take away from this pleasant paperback.

The story of Admiral, the Leicester-based football kit makers, begins in the 1960's when Patrick became the owner of a local underwear manufacturer, Cook & Hurst. Sensing a need to diversify in order to generate greater profits, the company rightly gauged an increase in football fanaticism after the 1966 World Cup and began making plans to produce and supply kit independently for teams far and wide.

What follows is a remarkable story of success forged through the amiable nature and astute dealings of the author. Starting off with the securing of a kit contract to supply Don Revie's Leeds United team in the early 70's, we learn of Patrick's impressive ability to gain further business with many other clubs thereafter. National team contracts also followed as England and Wales jumped on the Admiral bandwagon.

Two of the many photos seen in 'Admiral: Kit Man'
As Bert Patrick added more and more domestic signings to his portfolio, he started looking further afield and soon teams in Europe, the Middle East and the USA were adopting the Admiral brand. Yet just as business was truly booming for Patrick and his company, the growing market for cheap foreign imported merchandise started to impact greatly on Admiral's once bulging revenues. Within a few short years, Patrick was forced to sell Admiral to a Dutch Oil company and by the early 1980's, their name had become a virtual non-entity in British football.

The tale is an interesting one and well worth telling. We hear of Patrick's many meetings with important figures from British football history and his occasional dealings with the BBC and the Football Association, to say nothing of the many business trips he made around the world. All very fascinating, but after reading the book I was still left with a hunger to get a bit more detail. What of the kit designs that were never adopted or the fine details of some of the contracts he helped to rubber-stamp? What were Bert Patrick's favourite kit designs and what did he think of the work of Admiral's competitors?

Unfortunately these are watered down by the copious colour photographs showing off all too many Admiral kits. On average, there's a photo on every third pages of this book, and that's too much given that most readers will already know what the great Admiral kits looked like. John Devlin's excellent kit illustrations also make an appearance to expand on the imagery further still, but I'd have kept those and cut the photographs by at least half in return for more of Bert Patrick's dialogue.

John Devlin's kit illustrations, as featured in the book
Though the text is fine, in and of itself, it's sadly let down by the obvious misspelling of the names of players and managers. With references to Keith Bircumshaw, John Lyle and Franz Bechenbauer, the book loses a little of its credibility - something that could have been easily avoided if someone had bothered to double-check the details. The flow of the narrative is also vague at times, not always following a chronological order and liable to diversion at odd tangents.

For all that, though, it's still a very nice book, and it leaves you feeling an undeniable admiration for the author and the way he brought so much colour and interest to British soccer throughout the 1970's. Many happy memories of Admiral's fine kit designs are brought to mind as you turn every page, and you can't help wishing the company was still as prominent today as it was all those years ago. Perhaps one day it will be, but for now it's nice to know that Bert Patrick's achievements have been proudly recorded for future generations to read.

'Admiral: Kit Man' by Bert Patrick is available via Amazon UK, Waterstones and all good book stores. RRP: £10.99

Chris O's Favourite 5... Commentators

$
0
0
It's been a long while since we've had a 'Favourite 5' on the Football Attic website, but it struck me the other day that there's been a glaring omission from the series that's covered everything from World Cup Shirts to Subbuteo Accessories That Never Were. So far we've overlooked the great TV commentators from the golden era of British football, but that's all about to change. Here, in no particular order, are my Favourite 5...

1. Barry Davies

Surely every TV football commentator has a responsibility to deliver on various promises. He needs to be well-informed, entertaining and capable of knowing when to let the pictures do the talking rather than himself. Barry Davies did exactly that, but his patter was also interesting... VERY interesting.

Not only could he fill you in on the background information relating to a team's recent form or a player's goalscoring record, but he could also lend his opinion to a refereeing decision, the condition of the playing surface or even the suitability of a team's kit. His views weren't always guaranteed to tally up with your own, but they were always delivered in such a way as to make you think beyond the images you were seeing on your screen.

While today's commentators spout an endless stream of statistics and puns in an attempt to sound clever, Barry Davies really was clever. He had the intelligence to phrase his thoughts in an erudite, original way, but he could also make an incident in a match memorable by imparting elation, humour and joy at the things we'd all seen.

To say he's missed from modern-day TV football coverage is an understatement. Barry Davies is worth 100 of the commentators we're made to suffer these days, and it's difficult to see where someone of his professionalism will come from next.

2. Martin Tyler

It's ironic that many people these days associate Martin Tyler with the single word "AGUEROOOOOO!" - as if his career as a commentator could be summarised in that one instance. The fact is, Tyler has been commentating on TV since 1974 and has proven to be outstanding at it for nearly 40 years.

It's fair to say that he does rely a little on statistics while on air - virtually every commentator has or does - but his measured style of delivery ensures that we're not bombarded with every fact known to man while he's behind the microphone. He also describes what he sees with a lightness of touch and allows himself the occasional indulgence of giving the viewer his opinion on certain incidents. In such cases, Martin Tyler reassuringly remains impartial throughout and doesn't provoke controversy for the sake of making a name for himself.

What I like about his commentary most, however, is that he doesn't talk for the sake of talking. Martin Tyler provides a gentle flow of words drip-fed throughout a match that tells us what we need to know in a passive way. His voice doesn't impede our enjoyment of what we're seeing, nor does it overwhelm our ears with the pretentious waffle we hear so much nowadays. In short, his commentary style is subtle, but he saves himself for those moments - as with Aguero - that require some unadulterated euphoria... and that's no bad thing at all.

3. Brian Moore

What else can we say about Brian Moore that we haven't already said on this website? First heard on British TV in 1968, Moore's often loud and excitable voice was perfect for the raw, unpolished football of the era. The crowds were large, the players were real characters and the goals were often spectacular - and Brian Moore conveyed every exciting aspect of the action he saw.

He wasn't the only commentator to adopt an exhilarated and shouty approach whenever a goal went in - many of his peers did the same in their younger days - but his verbal style did mellow with age and his naturally descriptive style came through more and more in time.

What I particularly like about Brian Moore is his ability to switch between a wistful, almost resigned vocal delivery to a more urgent speech tone whenever the occasion required it. He was also a master at spotting the little vignettes in a game where a minor incident was worth highlighting and bringing to the attention of the viewer.

To top it all, he wasn't afraid to enjoy the humour that was so much more a part of the game back in the 1970's in particular. As front-man for The Big Match and many other ITV Sport programmes, he always presented football with a smile and an enthusiasm for the game that couldn't be anything other than infectious. An accomplished and versatile man indeed.

4. Hugh Johns

In many ways, Hugh Johns didn't possess the component parts that make up a great commentator. His way of describing a great goal usually involved lots of volume, the utterance of an easy-to-impersonate phrase and a predilection for making fairly basic statements.

Yet the Berkshire-born ITV commentator was as distinctive a voice as you'd ever have heard and was undoubtedly one of the best there's ever been. Though he applied his talents to regional football in the Midlands during the 1970's and 80's, he was also rightly sent around the globe to convey the excitement of World Cups and other top events throughout his career.

Unlike some commentators, Johns didn't have a catchphrase as such, but his preference for the word 'nothing' rather than 'nil' (as in "One-nothing!") became his trademark. He was also able to engage the viewer with a friendly turn of phrase such as "What about that then?" that made you feel like your thoughts had been expressly asked for.

Evidence of his vocal exuberance is littered all over the great matches from history, but somehow it chimed best with Brazil's sunshine football of the 1970 World Cup. From a goal denied by England ("That's a good crossed ball... it's Pele... And a fan-TASTIC save by Banks!") to a goal scored in the Final ("What a beautiful goal from Pele! El Rey, Pele!") his love of great football was beyond doubt - which is exactly as it should be.

5. David Coleman

I've already made reference to the way some commentators can vary their speech between gentle and raucous, but David Coleman rarely seemed capable of the former. Virtually everything that fell from his mouth was spoken with such insistence that you knew he absolutely meant every single word.

This gave the former Sportsnight and Grandstand presenter an air of forcefulness and even sternness at times, but it made you sit up and listen. Coleman might have been discussing the most mundane or irrelevant of matters, but the clarity and vigour with which he spoke was enough to infer authority and importance with every syllable.

An ample example of this can be found in his oft-uttered phrase "One-nil!" but also in his scene-setting for so many FA Cup Finals and World Cup Finals. Yet as is so often the case for any commentator, it was his ability to enhance the excitement of a goal scored or a great passage of play that defined his legendary status. His voice could cut through the noisiest of crowds and it was worth hearing for all his succinct phrasing and deliberate narration.

Very few of today's commentators have a notable style that helps them to stand out from the rest, but Coleman, like the rest of my Favourite 5, had character by the bucket load. They all played their part in forging a golden age of football commentary and were without question as valuable a part of the game for us TV viewers as the players were.

Podcast 20 - We Want Your Memories!

$
0
0
No it's not a new podcast...yet... Also, no, it's not some kind of mid-80s Twilight Zone episode!

We'll soon be recording the 20th Football Attic podcast and, as that's some kind of important number (ish) and we're almost 3 years old, we thought we'd get all self indulgent and do an Attic retrospective.

This actually stemmed from a conversation between Chris and myself about what we've really enjoyed about putting this whole thing together...so we decided to spend an hour engaging in hearty slapping of backs and warm hugs all round, though court orders may inhibit the latter ;-)

We'll be talking about our general memories of the last 3 years from our first, virtually unnoticed posts, to the heights of getting a mention on the Guardian website, making several other proper blog sites' lists of top blogs and generally getting to know a whole bunch of decent people :)

And hey, if we're being all self indulgent, why not get you to join the love in?  Because that's sickening you say? Shame I can't hear you la la la!!!

To that end, we'd like to hear about your own memories & thoughts on the Attic - what you've liked, what you haven't, what we could do better, what you'd like to see more / less of etc etc etc

So, please leave your comments below, tweet us or leave a message on Facebook and we'll do our usual and try to read them all out...except the horrible ones of course, we're not mental!!! ;-)

League Ladders

$
0
0
It won't be long before the domestic football season starts again. Hopes of success will be uppermost in our minds as we finally put to one side the pre-season tournaments given hollow reverence by Sky Sports or the endless prattle of  'experts' on Twitter in favour of real, proper football.
As children, there were no such distractions to impede our excitement of the new season. Entertainment was provided in the form of flimsy cardboard, decorated in bright colours and perforated purposefully by the makers of Shoot! magazine. Their annual gift to us was the League Ladders, an offering that never failed to cause excitement in our juvenile lives, if only for a few short weeks.

Back in the day when comics and sticker collections took precedence over seemingly everything else, the acquisition of Shoot! every week brought about a feeling of quiet contentment. Our thirst for football knowledge was satiated by the news, interviews and features held within its pages, to say nothing of its team pictures and player profiles. In short, it was a pocket-money package of football delight.

Towards the end of every summer, however, Shoot's front cover featured two words guaranteed to send a tingle of frenzy into every corner of our brains: 'Free Inside.' Something good was bound to follow, and inevitably it did in the form of those legendary League Ladders. They were nothing more than a series of T-shaped tabs ready for slotting into pre-printed empty league tables, yet somehow they symbolised the exciting potential of well over 120 English and Scottish League clubs. All we had to do was collect the tabs and place them in the correct order every week.


There would soon be pitfalls to overcome. To begin, you had to buy Shoot! every week until you'd obtained every set of tabs for every team. It sounds easy enough, but there was always the potential for your local newsagent to run out of issues when you least expected it. Seeing Division 4 lying empty while Scottish Division 2 was complete would always rankle with you as the season progressed, so a full set of team tabs was a must for any supporter worth their salt.

Having obtained all the tabs, your next job was to make sure none of them ended up in the dustbag of your mum's Hoover Deluxe, or worse still, be eaten by your pet dog. Making replacement tabs out of a breakfast cereal box was always possible, but it was never going to better the real thing.

If you could get past that obstacle, there were a number of things you could do with your pristine set of League Ladders before the season got into full swing. Some people liked to arrange the teams in the order they predicted for the end of the competition. This usually meant placing your own team at the top of Division 1 while their greatest rivals were at the other end.


As a lasting reminder, some were known to write the number of their predictions on the back of each tab - a clever idea, assuming they'd not thrown the whole thing away out of sheer boredom by Christmas. More of which later...

Once the season was underway, however, you had but one responsibility, and that was to update the positions of every team tab in every division - from August until the following May. For me, that meant taking the two-minute walk every Sunday morning down to the home of Dean and Michael Potter. Once there, we'd sit outside on their front doorstep, changing the order of our tabs in accordance with the tables printed in the Sunday Mirror, recently acquired from the clutches of their no doubt displeased father.

We'd do that for a few weeks and then stop, because quite frankly there are few things as boring as rearranging the positions of dozens of pieces of cardboard that you'd only rearranged the week before. Oh sure, it was fun for a short while, but after that you realised that it was merely stopping you from doing something else more interesting, like playing football in your local park or devising an index system for your C60 cassette collection.


For the most committed, Sunday morning was far too long to wait before updating their League Ladders. For them, the challenge was to do so just after 5pm on a Saturday afternoon when Grandstand showed the updated league tables. Quite how they managed this is something of an enigma as the tables were never displayed for more than ten seconds on screen. For those with Ceefax TV sets, however, the 'Hold' button on the remote control was a useful tool, as long as your parents were prepared to miss the first 20 minutes of The Little and Large Show.

Despite the added allure of being able to fill in your team's results or plot their league positions on the Progress Chart, the number of people that kept their League Ladders up-to-date throughout an entire season was nil. Our interest in those little cardboard tabs quickly dwindled every season, yet year after year we rediscovered League Ladders with all the relish of someone that had never clapped eyes on them before.

Why? Was it the regularity with which they appeared year in, year out without fail? Certainly the history of League Ladders goes way back to a Rover comic of 1923, after which it appeared in publications such as Lion and Roy of the Rovers right through to the modern era with Match magazine and many others. Even The Football Attic has paid tribute to the League Ladders legend in admiration of its lasting appeal.


Nowadays, you can find online versions and magnetic versions if you're so inclined to be entertained, but let's face it, nothing can beat the Shoot! version... except perhaps the Shoot! version itself. Every year they'd produce the same item (albeit slightly redesigned), and every year we should have told them where to stick it. We knew we'd probably get bored of playing with our tabs and ladders all too quickly, and yet we'd always ensure sure we had one every season without fail.

Designed to provide joy for no more than a month (but what joy), we salute the illogically wonderful League Ladders, in whatever form they take. A triumph for enduring brilliance over sustained excitement, you can be sure someone will be writing something similar to the above 50 years from now.

Our sincere thanks to Alan Jenkins of the wonderful Football Cartophilic Info Exchange for allowing us to reproduce the above images.

Football Tat We've Owned Number 1 - Euro 96 Plasters

$
0
0
While both of us here in the Attic love football ephemera (in fact, that was nearly the name of this blog), Chris tends to stick to the, shall we say, quality end of the scale of football collectibles. I, on the other hand, am notorious for collecting what could best be described as "utter crap".

It struck me just how much of this I've bought down the years, while trying to describe my latest acquisition that falls easily into this category to Jay from DesignFootball.com :

Me: "Here's my life in a nutshell: tonight I spent £16 on a Japanese Coke can because it comes with a World Cup Trophy clock inside it"

Jay: "How do you get to the World Cup trophy clock?"

Me: "It's a fake can"

More on that particular beauty when it arrives...

To kick off this occasional series, the marvel of marketing that is Euro 96 plasters!

That's right, I bought some sticking plasters from Boots, just because they had the Euro 96 logo on them. That said, don't get me wrong here, I don't regret this purchase whatsoever as the logo was great (a freeform art football in many primary colours) and I did actually need some plasters...probably.

What it demonstrates however, is the sheer banality of products that get decorated with the latest money making tournament artwork and moreover that this happens because people like me will gladly buy it!

What prompted me to write about these was actually finding two of them in an old first aid box while clearing out my garage recently - I thought I'd used them all at the time... 1996 it seems was a very injury-prone year! I can find virtually no info on them anywhere and I sadly no longer have the box, but they appear to be made by Curity and they were an official licensed product (none of your cheap rip-off plasters here!)  So sit back and revel in the glory that is a Euro 96 Plaster!



The Football Attic Podcast 20 - A Football Attic Retrospective

$
0
0
The Football Attic is nearly 3 years old and we've reached the milestone that is our 20th Podcast... so what better way (any?) to celebrate than with a bit of good old fashioned back slapping?

So, for your aural entertainment, sit back and let Chris and Rich guide you on a journey into the darkest corners of the Attic.

Find out how it all started, hear what our favourite things have been and just enjoy the sound of two middle aged men indulging in self love... er...


Download:
Subscribe on iTunes or download here. Alternatively, catch The Football Attic Podcast on Square One Football Radio.

See also:
The Football Attic Podcast archive

League of Blogs 2014

$
0
0
Yes folks it's League of Blogs time again!

What's 'League of Blogs' I hear some of you ask? Well, you can have a look at the entire history of the project here or take a look back at last year's and 2012's to get a quick overview, but in short it all started with a love of designing kits and a desire to share that with other bloggers.

Once again, we've not rested on our laurels and have striven to come up with something different for 2014.

As such, the theme for this year's League of Blogs is the"Turn of the Century" (the 19th/20th Century, that is, not the year 2000!). Now, that doesn't mean your designs have to reflect the style of that era (though the little Subbuteo man does have a rather 1900's look about him this year), but what it does mean is instead of a wallchart or sticker book, League of Blogs 2014 will be presented as old-timey cigarette cards. Genius!

As with last year, we'll be allowing badges as well as kits, though again, just a Home and Away kit... they didn't have 3rd kits in 1900 so we're not having them now ;-)

There's also a great prize this year! Whoever we choose as having our favourite kit design will win a whole Subbuteo team hand-painted in their winning design, courtesy of the awesome Adam of Fantasy Flicker. (Last year's winner & several other LoB entries can be seen here)

So here's what you need to do:


  • Create a 'club badge' for your blog or podcast. You may have a logo already, but if you want to create a new one anyway, that's fine.
  • Create a kit. You can create an 'away' one as well if you wish... we've made room for one. No '3rds' this time though :)
  • Create a tagline for your blog. This should be a single sentence explaining what your blog or pod is or what it aims to achieve.
For the kits:

Choose a template to download by clicking on the JPG or GIF images below. When the full-size version opens up on your screen, save it to your computer.



.GIF template



.JPG template

Get colouring! You can design your strip digitally with a graphics package like Adobe Photoshop or you could print the template out, colour it in with your felt-tip pens and scan the finished article. Either way, you should have a .JPG or .GIF file at the end of the process for each strip you're designing.

Send your .JPGs or .GIFs to admin [at] thefootballattic [dot] com along with your website's name and URL.

Oh and if you're not much of a designer or you don't own any felt-tip pens, why not tell us what you'd like your kit to look like? Email us at the address shown above with as much detail as possible and we'll try to turn your ideas into reality!

For the badge:

Freestyle is the name of the game here! :) You can create a traditional coat of arms/shield-based badge or you can create a modern-style logo. Of course if you already have a logo for your website or podcast, you can submit that as your 'club badge.' If you need any help creating anything, just give us a shout and we'll see what we can do.

Once you've done that, we'll present them in the following style in the League of Blogs Gallery.

Badge
Home
Away
Right... that's our efforts... now over to you!

Any questions, give us a shout in the comments below, via Twitter or on Facebook.

P.S. If you've entered the League of Blogs previously, you can use your old badge / kits if you wish... just let us know.

The Guinness Book of Soccer Facts & Feats (1979)

$
0
0
There was a day, long, long ago, when the name of Guinness loomed large in the literary world. You could buy The Guinness Book of Car Facts & Feats, The Guinness Book of British Hit Singles, The Guinness Book of Wild Flowers... I'm also led to believe there was a long-running series of books about people breaking records, too, but let's not get sidetracked by that. Back in the 1970's, if you wanted to feed your brain with morsels of football-related knowledge, The Guinness Book of Soccer Facts & Feats was the book to read.

The first edition of Jack Rollin's kick-and-run compendium was published in 1978 and four more were released, the last of which arrived in book shops in 1983. I was recently lucky enough to purchase a copy of the second edition, and as you'd expect, it really does pack in more facts than Stephen Fry on speed.

The level of detail at times is staggering, right from the moment you peruse the inside front and rear covers displaying the winning records of all League Championship-winning sides from 1889 onwards. Not only do you get the final points tallies and goal difference stats, but also the number of players used in each squad and the number of ever-present players they contained. And that's before you get to the Introduction.


The first main section of the book is 'Milestones' which uses as its basis the original laws of football from 1872. This in itself is a revelation as one discovers some elements of the game that have long since been changed or removed altogether. Who knew that after a goal was scored, the teams would always change ends? And the rule that states "No player shall wear nails, except such as have their heads driven in flush with the leather... on the soles or heels of his boots" only makes the mind boggle further at the way football used to be.

Further revisions of the laws are detailed and the wonderment continues. The two-handed throw-in? That arrived TEN years after the first rules were formed. Goal nets didn't arrive for a further eight years after that. And when were numbers first worn on shirts in an FA Cup Final? In 1933 - SIXTY-TWO years after the first FA Cup competition took place.

This fire-cracker set of facts and figures gets the book off to a great start, but it's swiftly followed by another great section called 'British Soccer - League Club Stories'. Here, each of the clubs in the English and Scottish Leagues has a paragraph devoted to it and a notable story from its history. Some of the tales told by Rollin are delightfully entertaining and brilliantly worded. Here's my favourite one, all about Hartlepool United:

"On 27 November 1916 a doomed German Zeppelin, caught in the glare of searchlights and in flames from the fire of a persistent Royal Flying Corps pilot's armoury, jettisoned its remaining bombs as it made for the sea. Two of them shattered the main stand at Hartlepool United's ground. After the war the club claimed £2,500 compensation form the German government. The claim was relentlessly pressed by correspondence, but the only tangible reply was another bomb on the ground in the Second World War."

What then follows is an admittedly drier section that details the highest and lowest number of league wins, league goals and league defeats by various teams, but relief quickly comes in the eight pages of colour photographs that succeed it. Although the focus here is on the important figures of the day - Brian Clough, Trevor Francis and Ron Greenwood among them - there's also a lovely double-page spread showing a montage of football programmes from around the world.


With that out of the way, it's back into a seemingly unending mass of rudimentary facts and figures about British league clubs and international cup competitions. It's here that the informal tone from earlier in the book gives way to serious statistics, but reading this as a kid, you'd have been soaking up all this knowledge like a sponge. It's what you did when you were younger, and if your juvenile self was keen to learn who Manchester City played during their 1976-77 UEFA Cup run or something just as irrelevant to the average man on the street, this book came up trumps again and again.

After a second selection of colour photographs (this time from the 1978 World Cup) and an assessment of world football and its key players and competitions, the book ends with a Miscellany that again makes one smile with its detail. We learn that Robert Howell of Sheffield was the only gypsy to play for England and that Albert Iremonger of Notts County was, at 1.96 metres, the tallest player to appear regularly in the Football League. (Think Peter Crouch, but seven centimetres shorter.)


Surely, though, the final word about this excellent book has to go to its feature on the 'Football League's Foreign Legion' - those players born overseas that were plying their trade in England during the 1978-79 season. If anyone's curious to know what football was like 36 years ago, just be aware that all 13 foreign players were listed in a space no bigger than three inches by ten on one of its pages. Time marches on, but books like this provide the context by which we judge modern-day football, and beautifully so.

-- Chris Oakley
Viewing all 451 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>